Methodological approaches to establishing areas of responsibility of authorities during preparation and implementation of integrated development programmes
Methodological approaches to establishing areas of responsibility of authorities during preparation and implementation of integrated development programmes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2024-3-77-81Keywords:
Integrated development programmes, methodological approaches, formation of integrated development programmes, areas of responsibility of the authorities of St. Petersburg in the preparation of integrated development programmesAbstract
A study of methodological approaches to the formation of integrated development programmes is presented. Monitoring of the provisions of regulatory legal acts on the development and approval of comprehensive development programmes was carried out. The features of regulatory requirements for the formation of comprehensive development programmes of various industry orientations are identified, and a conclusion is drawn about the priority of the industry approach. The main shortcomings of the current system for developing integrated development programmes and the need to take into account the components of economic and spatial planning are noted. Based on the proposed integrated approach for St. Petersburg, areas of responsibility of executive bodies of state power for the preparation and implementation of integrated development programmes have been identified, and proposals have been made to legislatively consolidate the proposed delimitation of powers of government bodies in terms of the preparation and approval of integrated development programmes.
The developments presented in the paper will make it possible to solve in practice the problem of establishing the order of interaction between executive bodies of state power in the formation of comprehensive development programmes, i.e. solve a problem that has important socio-economic significance for Russia.
References
Герцберг Л. Я. Качество городской среды: проблемы проектирования и реализации // Градостроительство. 2013. № 2 (24). С. 29–33. EDN QCKDXF.
Ершова С. А., Шишелова С. А., Орловская Т. Н. Экономические и правовые аспекты оценки эффективности градостроительных преобразований территории // Вестник МГСУ. 2020. Т. 15. Вып. 9. С. 1308–1320. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2020.9.1308-1320. EDN WWKFEY. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.9.1308-1320
Зотов В. Б. Стратегическое планирование в системе местного самоуправления (проблемный обзор и рекомендации) // Муниципальная академия. 2018. № 1. С. 6–9.
Соколова С. В. Городская среда и ее комфортность в городах Российской Федерации // Муниципальная академия. 2022. № 3. С. 173–179. DOI: 10.52176/2304831X_2022_03_173. EDN GOCOQR. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52176/2304831X_2022_03_173
Douglas O., Lennon M., Scott M. Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management // Cities. 2017. Vol. 66. Pp. 53–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011
Kirillova A., Kostrikin P. N. Setting the urban development standards as the basis of ensuring eco-economic sustainability of construction // MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018. Vol. 193. Р. 05024. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819305024. EDN HUXPHK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819305024
Krugman P. R. Geography and Trade. Cambridge (Mass.). 1991. 156 p.
Clark D. Urban world, Global city // Taylor & Francis e-Library. 2004. 211 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015193
Krätke S., Taylor P. J. A world geography of global media cities // European Planning Studies. 2004. Vol. 12. Nо. 4. Рр. 459–477. DOI: 10.1080/0965431042000212731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000212731
Стерник С. Г. Комплексное развитие территорий и экономика регионов // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2023. № 2 (197). С. 57–75. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-197-57-75. EDN LSMBKA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-197-57-75
Грабовый П. Г., Самосудова Н. В. Законодательная основа, правоприменение и перспективы развития жилищной политики и жилищных отношений // Недвижимость: экономика, управление. 2020. № 2. С. 73–82. DOI: 10.22227/2073-8412.2020.2.73-82. EDN UCHKQC.
Ларионов А. Н., Ларионова Ю. В. Проблемы повышения эффективности жилищного строительства на уровне макрорегиона // Журнал правовых и экономических исследований. 2017. № 1. С. 167–171.
Ershova S., Orlovskaya T., Shishelova S. Methodology of planning social infrastructure development to create a comfortable urban environment // MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018. Р. 02018. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817002018. EDN VBPTTQ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817002018
Лукманова И. Г., Яськова Н. Ю. О новых задачах инвестиционно-строительной деятельности в контексте трендов пространственного развития России // Вестник МГСУ. 2019. Т. 14. Вып. 6 (129). С. 774–784. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2019.6.774-784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2019.6.774-784
Яськова Н. Ю., Сарченко В. И., Хиревич С. А. Комплексный подход к формированию качественной городской среды // Недвижимость: экономика, управление. 2020. № 2. С. 12–21. DOI: 10.22227/2073-8412.2020.2.12-21. EDN HDYWVW.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Real estate: economics, management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
