Influence of judicial practice on the development of investment and construction sector and ensuring conflict-free project realization
Influence of judicial practice on the development of investment and construction sector and ensuring conflict-free project realization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2023-4-69-72Keywords:
judicial practice, conflict-free construction, government regulation measures, conciliation procedures, project mediationAbstract
In the current conditions of sanctions pressure and crisis phenomena, state regulation measures in the investment and construction sector should be aimed at preventing and eliminating contradictions and disputes between business entities, that is, the effectiveness of such measures must be assessed based on the ability to ensure conditions for conflict-free construction. At the same time, the concept of “conflict-free” does not mean the absence of disputes as such, but refers to the most constructive approaches to resolving disagreements, taking into account the interests of the participants in the relationship and the development priorities of the system as a whole. Of particular importance in achieving this goal is the activity of the judiciary in the field of forming a uniform judicial practice, focused on development priorities, as well as the application of judicial assistance technologies in the use of conciliation procedures in relation to construction disputes. Thus, the most significant recently developed positions relate to the extension of framework that is absent in the legislation, the interpretation of contract terms, the use of support measures and anti-sanction regulations, the peculiarities of bringing to responsibility for violation of urban planning standards and the consequences of non-compliance with mandatory requirements at the starting phase of the project. Analysis of approaches developed in judicial practice allows to identify risks associated with the implementation by public bodies (the prosecutor's office) of control and supervision functions. Assistance in the use of conciliation procedures, in turn, allows parties to use more flexible formats aimed at finding a mutually acceptable solution to a conflict situation within the court. At the same time, the problem of participation of public bodies in conciliation procedures remains relevant, significantly reducing their effectiveness.
References
Зайцева Л. И. Альтернативные способы разрешения споров в контексте межгосударственных отношений и экономического правосудия в Российской Федерации : монография. М. : Оригинал-макет, 2015. 216 с.
Kathleen M.J.H. Conflicts between owner and contractors: proposed intervention process // Journal of Management in Engineering. 2003. Vol. 19. Issue 3. Pp. 121–124. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:3(121) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:3(121)
Hayati K., Latief Y. Risk analysis and prevention system to minimize claim and dispute on construction projects // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019. Vol. 365. Issue 1. P. 012030. URL: 10.1088/1755-1315/365/1/012030 (дата обращения: 30.10.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/365/1/012030
Shash A. A., Habash S. I. Disputes in construction industry: owners and contractors' views on causes and remedies // Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management. 2021. Vol. 11. Issue 1. Pp. 37–51. DOI: 10.2478/jeppm-2021-0005 URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348122604_Disputes_in_Construction_Industry_Owners_and_Contractors'_Views_on_Causes_and_Remedies (дата обращения: 30.10.2023).
Целых А. Генпрокуратура поставила рекорд по делам о пересмотре приватизации 90-х. Что общего у предприятий, которые изымает государство. ООО «ЭрТиВиАй Продакшн» // RTVI. 23.10.2023/12:12. URL: tories/genprokuratura-postavila-rekord-po-delam-o-peresmotre-privatizaczii-90-h-chto-obshhego-u-predpriyatij-kotorye-izymaet-gosudarstvo/?ysclid=lo8zc9emoh135440482 (дата обращения: 30.10.2023).
Яськова Н. Ю., Зайцева Л. И. К вопросу внедрения внесудебных методов разрешения споров в строительстве // Экономика строительства. 2019. № 5 (59). С. 13–22. URL: https://elibrary.ru/bhkltd
Senan M. H., Alzaghrini N., Srour I. Mediation tactics and effectiveness in dispute resolution // Responsible Design and Delivery of the Constructed Project. 2018. P. 6. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326816391_MEDIATION_TACTICS_AND_EFFECTIVENESS_IN_DISPUTE_RESOLUTION (дата обращения: 30.10.2023).
Яськова Н. Ю., Зайцева Л. И. Исследование зарубежного опыта эффективного разрешения хозяйственных споров предприятия // Известия высших учебных заведений. Технология текстильной промышленности. 2018. № 4 (376). С. 128–135.
Гайдаенко Шер Н. И. Альтернативные механизмы разрешения споров как инструмент формирования благоприятной среды для предпринимательской деятельности (опыт России и зарубежных стран) : монография / отв. ред. Н. Г. Семилютина. М. : ИНФРА-М, 2016. 248 с.
Зайцева Л. И. Условия и предпосылки внедрения внесудебных способов разрешения споров в инвестиционно-строительной сфере // Государственная служба. 2019. № 4 (120). С. 66–69. DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2019-21-4-66-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2019-21-4-66-69
Lu W., Li Z., Wang S. The role of justice for cooperation and contract’s moderating effect in construction dispute negotiation // Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2017. Vol. 24. Issue. 1. Pp. 133–153. URL: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1857354447 (дата обращения: 30.10.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2015-0002