Technologies and organization of constraction No. 4 (2023): Real estate: economics, management

Systematization of factors influencing the formation of carbon footprint value during the life cycle of capital construction objects

pdf
How to Cite

Systematization of factors influencing the formation of carbon footprint value during the life cycle of capital construction objects

Authors

  • Lyudmila Anatolyevna Oparina Ivanovo State Polytechnic University (IVSPU)
  • Yuliya Dmitrievna Obukhova Ivanovo State Polytechnic University (IVSPU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2023-4-39-42

Keywords:

carbon footprint, capital construction objects, factors, systematization

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is a system representation of the factors influencing the formation of the carbon footprint value formed during the life cycle of capital construction objects. The main methods of work are analysis and systematization. The results of the work are presented in the form of a matrix of factors. The use of this matrix makes it possible to make more accurate calculations of the carbon footprint value formed during the life cycle of capital construction objects, as well as to develop databases for the calculation of the identified factors.

190 72

Author Biographies

  • Lyudmila Anatolyevna Oparina, Ivanovo State Polytechnic University (IVSPU)

    Doctor of Science in Civil Engineering, Associate professor, Adviser of RAASN, Academician of REA, Head of the Department of Organization of Production and Urban Economy

  • Yuliya Dmitrievna Obukhova, Ivanovo State Polytechnic University (IVSPU)

    Postgraduate Student, Assistant of the department of Organization of Production and Urban Economy

References

Суворова М. О., Наумов А. Е. Scientific and theoretical approaches to complex assessment of building life cycle from a low-carbon development perspective // Недвижимость: экономика, управление. 2023. № 1. С. 6–10. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50790773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2023-1-6-10

Опарина Л. А. Определение понятия «энергоэффективное здание» // Жилищное строительство. 2010. № 8. С. 2–4.

Грановский Л. П. Энергосбережение и углеродный след зданий // Энергосбережение. 2021. № 6. С. 38–47. URL: https://www.abok.ru/for_spec/articles.php?nid=7917 (дата обращения: 30.11.2021).

Шубин И. Л., Стронгин А. С. Ключевые факторы влияния инженерного оборудования зданий на показатели углеродного следа // Биосферная совместимость: человек, регион, технологии. 2022. № 3 (39). С. 12–20. DOI: 10.21869/2311-1518-2022-39-3-12-20 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49555280

Опарина Л. А. Результаты расчета энергоемкости жизнен­ного цикла зданий // Жилищное строительство. 2013. № 11. С. 50–52.

Мищенко А. В., Горбанева Е. П. Применение технологий информационного моделирования на всех этапах проектирования жизненного цикла объекта недвижимости // Организация строительного производства : мат. II Всеросc. Науч. конф. (г. Санкт-Петербург, 4–5 февраля 2020 г.). СПб., 2020. С. 195–206.

Шеина С. Г., Умнякова Н. П., Салтыков Н. О. Современные тенденции использования BIM для «зеленого» строительства // БСТ: Бюллетень строительной техники. 2019. № 6 (1018). С. 29–31.

Грабовый П. Г., Волков Р. В., Волгин В. В. Intelligent real estate management // Недвижимость: экономика, управление. 2023. № 1. С. 16–20. URL: https://n-eu.iasv.ru/index.php/neu/article/view/111/132

Laustsen J. Energy efficiency requirements in building codes, energy efficiency policies for new buildings. 2008. Pp. 5–85. URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-requirements-in-build­ing-codes-policies-for-new-buildings

Mulrow J., Machaj K., Deanes J., Derrible S. The state of carbon footprint calculators: An evaluation of calculator design and user interaction features // Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2018. Vol. 18. Pp. 33–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.12.001

Avlonas N., Nassos G. P. Life cycle analysis and carbon footprint. Practical Sustainability Strategies: How to Gain a Competitive Advantage. 2013. Pp. 217–226. DOI: 10.1002/9­781118787472.ch18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118787472.ch18

Lesage P., Margni M., Samson R. Biogenic. Carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment // Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2012. Vol. 17. Issue 1. Pp. 117–128. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00503.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00503.x

Atmaca A. Carbon footprint analysis of a residential building // UEMK 2019 Proceedings Book 24/25 Gaziantep University, Turkey, 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/­338117564_Carbon_footprint_analysis_of_a_residential_building

Watkins R. Lifecycle analysis, carbon footprint, sustainability // Sustainable Retail Refrigeration. 2015. Pp. 291–312. DOI: 10.1002/­9781118927410.ch13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118927410.ch13

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

Issue

Section

Technologies and organization of constraction

How to Cite

Systematization of factors influencing the formation of carbon footprint value during the life cycle of capital construction objects. (2023). Real Estate: Economics, Management, 4, 39-42. https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2023-4-39-42

Keywords

carbon footprint capital construction objects factors systematization